Northern Territory Country Liberal Party Senator Nigel Scullion is concerned about any future arrangements that could see visitors to the Cox Peninsula, west of Darwin, requiring a permit.

The Territory Government has dropped an appeal against the Kenbi land claim and claimants are refusing to rule out a permit system for fishing or camping in some areas of the peninsula.

Senator Nigel Scullion says the Labor Government should not have dropped the appeal and any permit system would affect residents' lifestyle.

"Any impediment to the same access that people enjoyed before clearly it's going to be a huge detriment," Senator Scullion said.

"It's unfortunate that the Government doesn't appear to be taking an appeal on behalf of Territorians forward."

The Federal Aboriginal Affairs Minister, Philip Ruddock, has yet to decide on the recommendations of the Aboriginal Land Commissioner's report on the Kenbi claim.

 


Oppose land claims
(Letter to the NT News)
May 16, 2002

The government has, as a matter of course, got to oppose all land claims in order to ensure their validity and protect the majority of people from false claims. The Aboriginal 25 per cent of the population already controls access to 75 percent of the Territory.

Aboriginal organisations operate in an overt, racist manner, demanding non-Aboriginals grovel for permits when we wish to (access) areas previously open to all.

The Kenbi land claim threatens to restrict the lifestyle of thousands of NT people, and is against the interest of the majority. What's happened to democracy?

John Lively,
Nightcliff, NT

 


Rebuttal: to White-mail ploy
Mick Lambe, May 28, 2002

If the Cox Peninsula (CP) was a cattle station (and there are some bigger than the CP in the Northern Territory) there would be no outcry about 'limited access'.

Most of the areas tourists and visitors use there, are not disputed for access, nor areas requiring permits.

Whereas all tourist destinations in the NT under the control of Parks and Wildlife have restrictions on access, animals, firearms, etc...

Locals on the CP rarely go beyond the Hotel, the rubbish tip and a few fishing spots nearby. "Crocodile Dundees" they're not.

These are simply ploys to 'white-mail' Aboriginal people into making concessions.

The reality is that most ammenities on the Cox Peninsula are situated in the area settled by non-Aboriginals (Mandorah), including access to Darwin by ferry.

Aboriginal access to ammenities is eternally challenged by Mandorah residents, on the basis of race.

Most "Aboriginal organizations" are NT or Federal Government Departments, with an economic interest in maintaining the cultural and economic infrastructure which has proven so deleterious to traditional Aboriginal people.

A fact, that members of these groups will acknowledge privately and which has been publically espoused by Kevin Gilbert, Murrandoo Yanner, Gary Foley and other Aboriginal activists.

So this whining is fairly incomprehensible to me, apart from it being the habitual hate-engendering, so beloved of the CLP and their 'left wing' the Labor Party.

Scullion's use of "detriment" is intentional.

Non-Aboriginal Senator Herron (since replaced by Ruddock) is to judge whether giving control of land stolen by non-Aboriginals to Aboriginal people, will cause "detriment" to non-Aboriginals.

My belief is that innovative and appropriate alternatives to the "White Plans for Black lands" proposals for the Cox Peninsula could (and should) be enacted. Obviously the old ideas (19th Century) still being promulgated, have failed.

The (predominantly White) township of Mandorah is essentially a 'beachhead' -- for a larger invasive force.

One, not merely inimical to Aboriginal self-determination, but driven by economic and social imperatives to destroy it. The evidence of this fact -- the poor social outcomes of Aboriginal people -- is ironically known as "progress".

The Kenbi claim has taken a quarter of a century to process and still faces final ratification -- a formality at this stage -- but with Ruddock now in control, who knows?

Large areas of the CP are 'held' by Federal government agencies already and actual physical Aboriginal occupation is miniscule, due to their being largely 'confined' to the Belyuen Community.

Surburban 'creep' on the CP would see traditional Aboriginal people transformed into the "itinerants" they are labelled as in Darwin...

...often (too often) by politically conservative Aboriginal people.

Permits are the only recourse Aboriginal people have, to prevent a 'traditional' disregard of their rights to culture and land, by non-Aboriginal people.

"What's happened to democracy?" asks John Lively.

Here's a song I wrote for 'Australia' Day 2001...


 

 

...to the music of 'Advance Australia Fair' that might help answer John's query on "democracy".

Advance Australians Fair (part 2)

We claim we're all Australians
(Not foreign parasites)
In Law and Opportunity
Boast all have equal rights

We call this a democracy
A White majority
That celebrates invasion by
A White minority

The truth is our Australia Day's
Racist hypocrisy

Mick Lambe 2001

 


Response to Federal and NT government attempts to evict Mick Lambe (after he'd complained of racism on the Cox Peninsula) by Traditional Owners

His home was destroyed two weeks after the 'Kenbi win' by Respondents in discrimination and victimization complaints ...

... NT Police refused to charge the people responsible.


Click image to enlarge

 

 


Reply from Bill Day

Real estate developers are making land grabs around the Australian coastline buying cheap farmlands then subdividing as close to the seaside as possible, turning the coastline into unimaginative suburban sprawl.

Contrast the controlled public developments at Rottnest island, once a prison for Aboriginal resistance fighters but now a sacred site for all Australians and being developed in a sustainable way with public consultation.

There are no cars allowed, a variety of accommodation is available and the island is the most popular holiday site in WA. Other coastal developments become environmental disasters which the public end up subsidising. The taxpayers pay for the rich people's playgrounds.

Even on Aboriginal ground at Maningrida in Arnhem Land on the north coast, white staff have the boats and homes overlooking the sea. They reckon they have the best and cheapest beachside sites in Australia and have resisted Aboriginal attempts to evict them.

Click to view enlarged

Lawyers have informed Aborigines in WA who have been granted native title rights on a dozen huge pastoral stations that they cannot set foot on the pastoral stations until they have public liability insurance.

These Aboriginal people built up the stations with cheap labour, breaking bones and receiving lifelong injuries with no thought of insurance cover. Now they are told that their native title right to visit their sites is meaningless because they are not insured.

This story will come out on the tenth anniversary of the greatest con in Australian history - the Mabo decision of June 1992.

Dr Bill Day


 

More on ‘Black Pastoralism'

05/06/2002

Dear All

This is a reminder that there is a seminar on TUESDAY 11th JUNE 2002 at AIATSIS, details as follows:

TUESDAY 11th JUNE, 2002 at 12.30pm to 2.00pm
, Seminar Room, AIATSIS
Lawson Crescent, Acton Peninsula, Canberra, ACT

Details as follows:

Speaker:
Stuart Phillpott, Director, Special Projects, Land Enterprise Australia:

‘Black Pastoralism in the Northern Territory, 1976-1996: Some contemporary Land Use Issues’.

ABSTRACT
Aboriginal peoples' involvement in the pastoral industry of the Northern Territory has been a feature of that industry almost since first contact between Aboriginal people and non-Aboriginal people. However, whilst Aboriginal involvement in the pastoral industry has been celebrated in terms of their bush skills and their qualities as stockmen, their association with the industry has always been ambivalent.

For it was the pastoral industry that occupied and exploited their traditional land. Aboriginal peoples’ involvement in the pastoral industry was both exploitative and oppressive as they were always restricted to fulfilling a labour provision role.

The development of Aboriginal people as owners and managers of pastoral cattle enterprises is relatively new, dating from the mid 1970s. This involvement has arisen in part through the policies directed at meeting Aboriginal peoples' land needs through various pastoral property acquisition policies, and in part through the privatisation of government and mission cattle projects.

The policies that have supported Aboriginal involvement as owners and managers of pastoral properties have varied over time ranging from support for employment, meat self-sufficiency and commercial success, to an increasing focus on commercial success only.

The increased emphasis of policy and program upon commercial success has had a number of outcomes. The number of properties receiving economic development support has been reduced, as has the actual number of operating beef cattle enterprises. In addition, herds on Aboriginal properties have been substantially reduced and there has been no real independent Aboriginal-owned and operated pastoral sector established.

This has occurred because, to a large extent, policy has ignored the biogeographical, social and industry factors that constrained the development of an Aboriginal-owned and operated cattle industry. The primary factor for the failure of the policies to develop a commercially successful Aboriginal owned, operated and managed cattle industry in the Northern Territory is that the policies and the programs that supported them did not support Aboriginal people in their multiple land use aspirations, which in many cases included cattle production.



Kenbi Claim 'win'


PARIAH view on Kenbi

Darwin Activism



MAIN MENU
Recent Articles